Pharmacy Undergraduates’ Epistemic Cognition and Medication Beliefs as Predictors of Conceptual Learning and Academic Progress
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55549/jeseh.735Keywords:
Epistemic belief, Conceptual knowledge, Academic performance, Learning progressionsAbstract
The importance of studies showing the impact of students' epistemic beliefs on their conceptual learning and academic progress is increasing. This study investigated pharmacy students’ domain-specific epistemic cognition and topic-specific beliefs related to their level of conceptual prior knowledge, learning and study progress during the first academic year. Data were collected from 125 students using a pre-test/post-test design with a multiple-choice questionnaire, an open-ended case task and a measure of domain-specific epistemic cognition and topic-specific beliefs concerning medication. The results showed that students’ prior knowledge predicted their academic performance and more sophisticated epistemic cognition was related to better conceptual understanding, faster study progress, and fewer anti-medication beliefs. Anti-medication beliefs hindered participants’ success in the case task and were related to weaker study progress. Our study shows that epistemic cognition and topic-specific beliefs play a role in students’ performance, learning, and study progress
Citation
Sodervik, I., Hanski, L., Laakkonen, E. & Katajavuori, N. (2024). Pharmacy undergraduates’ epistemic cognition and medication beliefs as predictors of conceptual learning and academic progress. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health (JESEH), 10 (4), 245-256. https://doi.org/10.55549/jeseh.735
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The articles may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Authors alone are responsible for the contents of their articles. The journal owns the copyright of the articles. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of the research material. All authors are requested to disclose any actual or potential conflict of interest including any financial, personal or other relationships with other people or organizations regarding the submitted work.